February 2026

Bangkok Post: ‘Nong Chompoo’ true-crime film coming to Netflix

The case of 3-year-old Nong Chompoo, who was found dead on a Mukdahan mountain six years ago, will be the subject of the first true-crime documentary by Netflix Thailand, with her uncle-in-law, the convicted killer, making an unexpected onscreen appearance.

Netflix Thailand unveiled its 2026 programme lineup on Friday night, closing with a documentary titled Chompoo: Lost & Forgotten.

What surprised the audience most was the screen appearance of Chaiphol “Uncle Phol” Wipha. His interview footage was believed to have been filmed before the Court of Appeal sentenced him to 26 years in jail in August last year for the death of Orawan “Nong Chompoo” Wongsricha in the northeastern province in 2020.

He is appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court, which has denied his bail request.

The toddler disappeared from her home in Kok Kork village in Dong Luang district of Mukdahan on May 11, 2020. She was found dead three days later on Phu Lek Fai mountain in Phu Pha Yon national park, about two kilometres from her home.

The Court of Appeal found Uncle Phol guilty of premeditated murder, child abduction and concealing a body.

The appeal court upheld the lower court’s acquittal of Chaiphol’s wife, Somporn “Pa Taen” Lappho, the sister of Nong Chompoo’s mother.

‘What makes a suspect turn into a celebrity?’

When Nong Chompoo vanished from her remote village, the police investigation quickly became a national spectacle. Overnight, the accused was thrust into the spotlight.

Uncle Phol consistently insisted on his innocence, and many who followed the case believed him, particularly his tearful TV interviews.

At one point, he became a minor celebrity, hired as a product presenter and featured in a music video by a famous Isan folk singer. He and Pa Taen reportedly received large donations from their “fans” and ran a YouTube channel with more than 350,000 followers.

“The film traces how a criminal investigation became a cultural spectacle and examines the forces that propelled it,” Netflix said.

Co-produced by Singapore-based Beach House Pictures and Thai Film Works, the documentary will also feature Trynh Phoraksa, a well-known criminologist specialising in psychology and criminal behaviour.

The release date has not yet been announced.

According to Netflix Thailand, the country’s entertainment industry has grown rapidly, and Thai creators’ ability to craft compelling content has gained global recognition, with notable titles such as Hunger, Master of the House and Mad Unicorn.

The 2026 content lineup, it said, reflects both evolving viewer behaviour and the growth of Thailand’s creative sector. Last year, more than 90% of Netflix viewers in Thailand chose to watch Thai content, underscoring its popularity, Netflix Thailand said.

Bangkok Post…

September 2025

SCREEN DAILY : Ray of Light to be Showcased at the TCCF Pitching Event

Taiwan Creative Content Fest (TCCF) has unveiled a bumper line-up of 94 projects to take part in its TCCF Pitching showcase, set to run November 4-7.

This year’s lineup features several cross-border adaptations of renowned IPs and international co-productions with strong market potential and international appeal, reflecting an ongoing global trend.

These include Taiwan Travelogue, a series adapted from Yang Shuang-zi’s award-winning novel of the same name; The Ones I Killed And The Ones Who Killed Me, a series adapted from Akira Higashiyama’s acclaimed novel; LOMÁ, a documentary from Berlinale Teddy award winner Huang Hui-chen; and animation A Banquet For Hungry Ghosts, adapted from Asian American food writer Ying Chang Compestine’s young adult horror story collection.

Some 56 titles will be showcased in the Project segment, including 20 feature films, 10 projects apiece for series, animations and documentaries as well as a further six series with the theme of “If Romance Comes Again”.

Scroll down for feature film Project titles

Among the highlights from the Project segment are Spent Bullets, adapted from Tetsuya Terao’s bestselling novel by Taiwanese filmmaker Henry Tsai; Goodbye My Love, Calendar Studios’ Taiwanese version of Korean drama Do It One More Time; Diary Of Summer from Japan’s Robot Communications, the production company behind Godzilla Minus One; documentary Atomic Paradise, headed by Sally Aitken, a two-time Emmy nominee; and drama series Second Woman, winner of both the FriDay Video Original Story Award and TVBS Storytelling Impact Grant Award in the Story to Screen segment of TCCF in 2023.

Several titles from the Project segment have also made it into this year’s Golden Horse Film Project Promotion, including two series (Taiwan Travelogueand The Ones I Killed And The Ones Who Killed Me) and four feature films (Burning Blossoms, Spent Bullets, Soul Lantern and Spring’s Grocery).

A further 38 projects of original published texts will be presented for IP adaptations in the Story segment.

Highlights include A Sketch Of A Female Serial Killer: Taiwan’s Only Female Death Row Prisoner And The Murders That Shocked a Nation, winner of the Taipei International Book Exhibition Grand Prize in the non-fiction category; Bodacious! Archdemons and Lifesaver Deployed, both of which are also selected for the upcoming Busan Story Market; and The Taste Of Brown Sugar, winner of the 2025 Taipei International Book Exhibition Grand Prize in the children’s book and young adult novels category.

TCCF Pitching received nearly 700 submissions from 44 countries this year and is set to be held at Taipei Nangang Exhibition Center. Aside from Taiwan, the top submitting countries were Japan, Thailand, the US, South Korea and Singapore. International submissions and co-productions involving Taiwan accounted for 60% of the entries, underscoring TCCF’s growing recognition on the global stage and a trend of cross-border collaboration in the content industry.

TCCF Pitching Project titles (feature films)

Burning Blossoms (Tai-Japan)
EP. Hitoshi Endo
Pro. Nobu Awata
Wri. Su I-Hsuan
Prodco. Suz Creative Studio

Diary Of Summer (Japan)
Dir. Remi Noda
Pro. Yusuke Yagi
Wri. Remi Noda
Prodco. Robot Communications

Fortune Seekers (Thai)
Dir. Yanyong Kuruangkura
EP./Pro. Nakarin Narkpreecha
Wri. Ploibutsara Phattrapornphisit
Prodco. Bebrave Entertainment Hub

Game Never Over (Tai)
Dir. Sean Chuang
EPs. Stefano Centini, Chang Chuti
Pro. Hung Sung-Ju
Wri. Ho Shing-Ming
Prodco. Volos Films

Goodbye My Love (Tai)
Dir. Yin Chen-Hao
EP./Pro. Jin Pai-Lunn
Wri. Ryan Tu
Prodco. Calendar Studios

Kamol (Thai)
Pro. Supatcha Thipsena
Wri. Chartchai Ketnust, Kong Pahurak
Prodco. White Light Studio

Love Letters From Tomorrow (Tai-Japan-S Kor)
EP. Peter Choe
Pros. Hsieh Yi-Lin, Ianne Cha
Wri. Yossef K. & Orign Pictures, Anne Wang
Prodco. Yoosonn Entertainment, Blintn

Midnight Express (Japan-HK-Thai-Malay-India-Uzbek-Turk-Greece-It-Fr-Sp-Port)
EP. Yamaguchi Shin
Pros. Abe Yoko, Sekiguchi Mio
Wri. Uchida Eiji, Mineo Kento
Prodco. Knockonwood

Mother Tongue (Japan-Tai)
Dir./Wri. Fu Tien-Yu
EP. Shinji Ogawa
Pro. Shoko Miyamori
Prodco. Bridgehead Co.

Mother’s Neck (Sing-Tai)
Dir. Yc Tom Lee
EPs. Jordan Lim, Charlyn Ng
Prod. Charlyn Ng
Wri. Nicholas Wang
Prodco. Juo Studios, Kusu Films

Naked In Glendale (US-China)
Pros. Jane Zheng, Julia Xu
Wri. Haohao Yan
Prodcos. Seesaw Productions, Q&A Entertainment

One Fine Day (Malay-Tai)
Dir. Tan Seng Kiat
EP. Sylvia Chang
Pros. Elyce Chin, Lim Shu Jia, E.N. Lee
Wri. Leong Siew Hong
Prodcos. One Fine Day Production House, Sunshine And Moonlight

Pivot (Tai-Turk-Ger-Serb)
Dir. Melisa Önel
Pros. Alara Hamamcıoğlu, Wesley Ko
Wri. Feride Çiçekoğlu
Prodcos. Awesomework S Production, Vigo Film, Aniden Film, Digitalkraft, Electric Sheep

Ray Of Light (Thai-Sing)
Dir. Nontawat Numbenchapol
Pros. Awat Ratanapintha, Tan Bee Thiam, Looi Wan Ping
Wri. T. Hantaweewatana
Prodcos. Mobile Lab Project, 13 Little Pictures

Seoul Story (S Kor)
EP. Summer Noh
Pro. Mark Brazeal
Wri. Kim Taeyang
Prodco. Milkyway Cinema

Soul Lantern (Tai)
Dir. Danny Tseng
EP. Lester Hsi
Pro. Fiona Hu
Wri. Jen-Fang Wang
Prodco. D-Day Pictures

Spent Bullets (Tai-US)
Dir. Henry Tsai
Pro. Jacqueline W. Liu
Wri. Henry Tsai, Terao Tetsuya
Prodco. Each Other Films

Spring’s Grocery (Tai-Indo)
Dir. Pan Ke Yin
EPs. Janice Chua, Cora Yim
Pro. Holly Chan
Wri. Aurora Lee

Prodco. Neverland Entertainment

The Daughter (Tai-HK)
Dir./Wri. Guan Tian
Pros. Patrick Mao Huang, Vivian Bao, Ding Ningyuan
Prodco. Flash Forward Entertainment, Uluka Productions

The Ghost Has A Rifle (Indo)
Dir./Wri. Iqbal Fadly
Pros. George Timothy, Siera Tamihardja
Wri. Cecille Christophia
Prodco. Creative Goods

Screen Daily

September 2025

VARIETY : Ray of Light to be Showcased at the QPM

The PhilippinesQCinema Project Market (QPM), the industry wing of QCinema International Film Festival, has unveiled its lineup of 20 selected film projects for its third edition, chosen from 71 submissions across Southeast Asia.

The slate comprises 12 projects from the Philippines and eight from neighboring countries, showcasing what organizers describe as bold voices, distinctive genres, and globally resonant stories.

Several QPM alumni are already making their mark on the international circuit. Malaysian auteur Woo Ming Jin’s “The Fox King” is set to world premiere at the Toronto Film Festival this month, underscoring the market’s role as an incubator for globally competitive works. Alumni also include Dương Diệu Linh’s “Don’t Cry, Butterfly,” winner of the grand prize at Venice Critics’ Week, and Loeloe Hendra’s “Tale of the Land,” which earned the Fipresci Prize at Busan.

“QPM is not just a platform — it’s a bridge,” said QCinema industry head Liza Diño. “By connecting Southeast Asian stories to the wider world, we are giving filmmakers the visibility and access they need to secure funding, partners, and distribution.”

The regional projects span diverse genres and themes. Singapore’s “Penumbra,” directed by Russell Morton and produced by Sophia Sim and Jeremy Chua, follows a man on the run who washes up on a floating fish farm with no means of escape, where he encounters mysterious occupants. From Thailand comes Nontawat Numbenchapol’s “Ray of Light,” a class-divided story set on a present-day film set styled after 1960s glamour, where a puppet-like star actress and an unseen lighting technician form a forbidden bond.

Cambodia’s “Romdoul, the Evening Fragrance,” directed by Lomorpich Rithy, tells the intertwined story of three generations of Cambodian women in a country still haunted by war and silence. Singapore’s 11th-century period fantasy “Strange Root,” directed by Lam Li Shuen and Mark Chua, features a yam-born demigod cast aside when a shipwrecked beast reawakens islanders’ lost desires. Malaysia’s “The Willing,” from director Joon Goh, follows an Indonesian migrant teen forced into underground fights and a schoolgirl trapped by her volatile mother who find sanctuary in each other.

Thailand’s “Ghost of the Currents,” directed by Patiparn Boontarig, centers on a man returning to his Mekong riverside village after a devastating flood, where villagers blame a vengeful River Ghost for the disaster. Vietnam’s “The River Knows Our Names,” directed by Mai Huyền Chi, explores life on the undocumented floating homes of the Mekong through a little girl’s birthday wish. Myanmar’s “When the World is Paused,” from director Han Thit Htoo Aung, spans from 2019 to 2025 as Than Sin falls into a coma before confessing his feelings to Nyein and must find her upon waking.

The Philippine slate showcases the country’s filmmaking diversity. Glenn Barit’s “Luzonensis and Floresiensis” presents two prehistoric hominids from the Philippines and Indonesia meeting as migrant workers in the land of colonizers. Jaime Pacena II’s “Ozzy and Onie” follows two star-crossed lovers in 1996 Manila torn between faith, family, and a collapsing system. Carl Joseph E. Papa’s “Sentinel” connects five lives grappling with fears and loyalties as a student newspaper article threatens to expose dark school secrets.

Jopy Arnaldo’s “KomiXXX” pairs two Filipinos on break from their Japanese film — an aspiring director and a “sexy” actress wanting to star in “serious” films — who come together to make an erotic comic. Sam Manacsa’s “The Void is Immense in Idle Hours” follows 19-year-old Rosemary, the only witness to a young boy’s disappearance, as she’s drawn into the search by the child’s desperate mother Agnes.

Tyrone Acierto’s “What’s Left Of Us” presents a couple and their chronically ill daughter fighting to stay sane in a collapsed world consumed by a dementia-like plague. Dominic Bekaert’s “Daddy Cool” unfolds during martial law in Manila’s disco era as a career woman finds herself in a tangle of love and jealousy with her female boss and their shared gigolo. Dodo Dayao’s “Dear Wormwood” disrupts the quiet lives of four mountain-dwelling women of faith with the arrival of a time-traveling ghost bringing the world to an end.

VARIETY

April 2025

VARIETY : Ray of Light to be Showcased at the Thai Pitch at Cannes program

The Thailand Creative Culture Agency (THACCA) will present three promising sophomore features from acclaimed Thai filmmakers at this year’s Cannes Film Festival, marking the 10th edition of the Thai Pitch at Cannes program.

The pitching event, scheduled for May 19-20 at the Thai Pavilion in Village International, continues its mission of connecting Thai filmmakers with potential investors, co-producers, funders, sales agents, distributors and festival programmers. The initiative has established a strong track record of launching successful Thai productions into the international festival circuit.

Taiki Sakpisit returns with “The Blind Earthworm in the Labyrinth” after his Rotterdam Fipresci Prize-winning debut “The Edge of Daybreak” (2021). The new project follows sisters Chareeya and Chalika who, after their parents’ deaths, become entangled in desire and haunted by memories within Bangkok’s shadowy underworld. Producer Cattleya Paosrijaroen, whose credits include Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s Cannes Jury Prize winner “Memoria,” is attached.

Itt Patiparn Boontarig presents “Ghost of the Currents,” which follows his debut “Solids by the Seashore” (2023) that won multiple awards at the Busan International Film Festival. His new supernatural drama centers on a man who returns to his flood-ravaged Mekong riverside village where locals believe a vengeful “River Ghost” is responsible for the disaster.

Nontawat Numbenchapol, who successfully transitioned from acclaimed documentary work to fiction with “Doi Boy” (2023), brings “Ray of Light,” a class-conscious drama set on a film production where a lighting technician and leading actress from vastly different worlds briefly connect. Veteran line producer Tanade Amornpiyalerk is producing.

All three projects recently received funding support from THACCA, with selection handled by a committee including Thai filmmaker-producer Pimpaka Towira, World Film Festival Bangkok director Donsaron Kovitvanitcha, and industry veteran Raymond Phathanavirangoon, who will coordinate the Cannes meetings.

Previous Thai Pitch success stories include “Arnold is a Model Student” (2022), “Anatomy of Time” (2021), “Die Tomorrow” (2017), and “Malila: The Farewell Flower” (2017), all of which secured international festival premieres and recognition.

Variety

March 2024

Nikkei Asia

“Thai filmmaker switches to fiction to reveal migrant realities”
An interview in which Nontawat discusses his move from documentary to narrative fiction with his debut feature Doi Boy, choosing fiction to protect the identities of the migrant workers who inspired the story.

read more…

 

August 2023

Variety : Gritty Thai Drama ‘Doi Boy’ Marks Feature Debut for Documentary Veteran Nontawat Numbenchapol: ‘Everyone Starts With a Dream’ (EXCLUSIVE)

After making four documentary features about border conflicts, ethnicity, prostitution and human rights, Thai director Nontawat Numbenchapol picks up many of the same themes in his first fiction feature “Doi Boy.”

The film, which premieres this week in the Jiseok competition section of the Busan International Film Festival, is the story of three young men living on the margins of society in Thailand and their common quest for justice. The characters are an illegal immigrant from Myanmar working, despite his own heterosexuality, as a gay prostitute in Chiang Main, a customer and an on-the-run political activist he is trying to help.

The narrative takes in a large number of the social and political problems that have beset seemingly idyllic Thailand in recent years – undocumented workers, illegal immigrants fleeing the civil war in Myanmar, an oppressive political power structure, enforced ‘disappearance’ of those who the government’s political opponents and critics, police brutality – and traffic jams.

“I was surprised to find so many immigrant men [from Myanmar’s Shan region] as sex workers in Chiang Mai. It is not because they want this kind of work, but because they are undocumented and forced into low-paid jobs. I thought about making this as a documentary, but the subject is too dangerous to do that way,” Numbenchapol told Variety. “Another reason that I took this route was that I felt I’d already learned a lot about making documentaries and risked becoming stale. In contrast when I saw this as a feature, I was excited again like a baby. Everything was new again.”

“I developed the film over five years, and the script changed a lot over that time, just as there were many important events that changed my country over that same period. I started with ethnic minorities and gender issues, but as the character moves to Thailand they have to give up their dream and face up to another set of social issues. These include corruption and environmental issues too,” said Numbenchapol, “But I think the biggest topic in my film is how everyone starts out with a dream, but that dream is not safe because of the social situation.”

Despite the gritty subject matter and the authorities’ list of taboo subjects that many well-known filmmakers have confronted, Numbenchapol says he did not encounter any censorship at the production stage. “I certainly worried about it, but I think that by making this as fiction was less of a problem than if we had made a film with real people’s names.”

Numbenchapol wrote a draft of the script and saw it significantly through a series of producers’ labs, project markets and co-production markets, starting with the 2016 SEAFIC development program, That was followed by 2017 EAVE Ties That Bind – Steve Chen, Producer, 2017 Busan Festival Asian Project Market, 2017 Luang Prabang Film Lab – Nontawat Numbenchapol, Director, 2018 Busan Asian Film School (AFiS) – Supatcha Thipsena, Producer, 2018 Berlinale Co-Production Market (with support from Goethe-Institut Thailand), 2018 Cannes Cinéfondation l’Atelier – Official Selection, invitation only, and the 2019 Cannes Thai Pitch.

A lot of the potential co-producers from Europe were interested but expected to see a portion of the budget come from Thailand. “It is not easy because Thailand does not have many funds like in Germany or France, and this project was likely too critical for it to receive support from the government’s fund,” said Numbenchapol. But, surprisingly, he found backing from new studio Neramitnung Film, which was interested in putting up the entire production budget.

“I talked with my [French Cambodian] producer Davy Chou (“Golden Slumbers,” “Return to Seoul”) at Anti-Archive, and we decided go with Neramitnung, because their money seemed really secure and to say sorry to some of the others who wanted to be involved,” said Numbenchapol. That left the film as a Thai-Cambodian co-production.

The budget was typical for a Thai-produced indie, pegged at $725,000. That was enough for 20 days of shooting and provided limited room for improvization.

Though Numbenchapol says he’d like to go further in the fiction register and has not committed to his next project, he won’t be turning his back on non-fiction either. “I make documentaries in order to make a living. I’m often contacted to help out on foreign production Or, to make short documentaries for NGOs, TV or as art. The income is not as bad as people think,” Numbenchapol says.

Variety…

June 2023

Art Review Asia

How can artists depict the lingering psychological aftermath of a period that stretches beyond comprehension? 

‘How do you illustrate something invisible?’ the British documentary-maker Adam Curtis once wondered in an interview, reflecting on the difficulties of making tangible intangible phenomena that are at once everywhere and nowhere, such as global warming or financial markets. Of late, Bangkok’s Jim Thompson Art Center – the programming of which has, since 2003, complemented the Jim Thompson House, the tourist attraction and former home of the eponymous American spy turned missing silk baron – has been obliquely answering that question. Shortly after the Center’s move to a hulking new concrete HQ in 2021, its director declared that ‘all exhibitions going forward will have a connection to the man, the era that he lived in, or to the house’. Thus far, its ongoing Future Project series has fulfilled that remit not by staging surveys of local crafts or textiles, but by treating the Cold War – a period contemporaneous with Jim Thompson’s life, disappearance and posthumous celebrity – as a hyperobject of sorts: an event so vast it is beyond our comprehension, yet qualitatively accessible through art.

Comprising three works by four Thai talents, Uncountable Time is a compact group show less concerned with depicting the Cold War as a definite period than revealing its lingering aftermath or hangover within Thailand, its temporal echoes, psychological legacies and somatic byproducts. The net result is a local history lesson of an elliptical, crepuscular and mildly revisionist sort – something for which its curator, artist Arin Rungjang, is himself rightly acclaimed.

Standing out against shadowy walls, Nontawat Numbenchapol and Kridpuj Dhansandors’s three-channel video A chip off the old block (2023) is the most straightforward offering: three relatives of three different activists take turns talking about how their loved ones were politicised and subsequently persecuted (and, in the case of two of them, possibly disposed of) by the Thai state using a well-thumbed autocratic playbook. Their talking-head accounts are stark – and starker still for the harsh white background and lack of context provided. An old woman speaking is the mother of an amateur actor forced to flee the country after performing in The Wolf Bride (a one-off student play judged to have broken the country’s lèse-majesté law), for example. But while I was able to infer who’s who, those unfamiliar with Thai politics only have their tense mannerisms and the slow reveal to go on. Here, for all the forensic detail of the two-plus hours of looped testimony, communicating each family’s truth appears less important than evoking how painful cycles of far-left radicalisation and far-right intimidation – which commenced with the Thai communist insurgency of the 1960s – continue.

If this video feels at several removes from the raw emotions in play, Viriya Chotpanyavisut’s dreamy image series Another Depth (2021) counterbalances. Elsewhere these ghostly, incidental closeups of natural phenomena – a pool’s surface gently shimmering, tree branches glowering – would likely trigger entirely different responses, but here they feel like litmus tests of angsty internal states. Their pallid, acidic tone suggests that the Cold War, in the Thai context, is not a monolith over yonder or in the rearview, but a lived and living event: it shapes and distorts perceptions; it bleaches idle moments; it is still felt and acted.

The most successful work grounds such resonances in a specific place, namely a mountainous swathe of Thailand’s rural road network. In TO AND FRO (2023), Rungruang Sittirerk offers a 22-minute roadtrip centred on the recollections of his uncle, a fruit-seller who regularly travels on the far north’s Chotana Road towards Bangkok. En route there are moments of personal yearning: the episodic voiceover draws upon Sittirerk’s own sad tale of rural-to-urban migration, and a recurring motif – a man scribbling on a blank map in various locales – suggests he wishes to find a home that no longer exists. But with sections on late-twentieth-century capital inflows and infrastructure, including how Chotana Road was built during the 1950s, it is also an ambivalent excavation of ideological landscape. In northern Thailand, the Cold War era brought superhighways and supply chains, abundance and affluence, just as it blew up mountains and pulled loved ones apart. And still today it skulks above forests, blows through warehouses and orchards, winds circuitously into the future, resembling a residue or sediment layered across the land.

Uncountable Time at Jim Thompson Art Center, Bangkok, through 30 June

Art Review Asia…

July 2020

AURA ASIA ART PROJECT

ドキュメンタリー作家 Nontawat Numbenchapol による映像インスタレーション『The Longest Way Round is the Shortest Way Home』 – Gallery VER

「近道は必ずしも最良の方法ではない」という慣用句を反映して、本作品『The Longest Way Round is the Shortest Way Home(最長の道は最短の道である)』は、しばしば法律文書なしに懸命な努力をしなければならない移住生活の複雑さとその不安定さを映し出します。『The Longest Way Round is the Shortest Way Home』のなかで、初めはより良い生活への近道として現れたのとは対照的に、特にミャンマーからタイへと、国境を越える行為は持続不可能な選択であることを明らかにします。システムとして社会から取り残された移民はしばしば、自由を制限されたり、祖国に戻ったりする以外に選択肢がないのです。

チェンマイのシャン人労働者に焦点を当てた『The Longest Way Round is the Shortest Way Home』の民族学的フレームは、ミャンマーの内陸部で撮影されたユニークな映像を通じて Numbenchapol の観察と現地リサーチを取り入れ、ある若者が6年後にシャン州の村に戻り、家族を訪ね、必要とされている国籍証明書の手続きをする旅をたどります。

撮影クルーを連れずに一人で撮影された Numbenchapol の映像は、主人公の移民としての自身の人生観、故郷を離れる痛み、国境を越えて新しい人生を抱くことへの期待を明らかにする、視覚的フィールドノートの集合体となっています。同時にその映像は、個人をつくる上で、自身の故郷、アイデンティティ、社会的な、またはその他の意味に帰属することとしないことについて、より大きな疑問を引き起こします。

引き込まれるような映像と音響インスタレーション、写真とミクストメディア作品とともに、『The Longest Way Round is the Shortest Way Home』は、東南アジアの国境を越えた包摂、排他、社会的需要の戦いについての対話を促することを目指し、また、同様のテーマの長編映画のためにNumbenchapol が行なっているチェンマイのシャン人労働者に関する現地リサーチの土台ともなっています。

アーティスト
Nontawat Numbenchapol は、フィクションやドキュメンタリー映画を制作しています。2013年には、タイとカンボジアの国境地帯に住む人々についての初ドキュメンタリー作品『Boundary』を制作しました。この映画はドイツのベルリン国際映画祭でプレミア上映されました。同年、Numbenchapol は水鉛汚染の影響を受けたKlity村に関する2作品目のドキュメンタリー映像『By the River』を制作し、ロカルノ映画祭でタイ映画として初めてスペシャル・メンション賞を受賞。2016年にはハイブリッド・ドキュ・フィクションの『#BKKY』を釜山国際映画祭でプレミア上映、ドイツの Lesbisch Schwule Filmtage Hamburg から長編特別優秀審査員賞を受賞しました。2016年以来、Numbenchapol はタイとミャンマーの国境で、シャン州軍の軍事キャンプでの若者たちの生活をリサーチしています。その経験に基づき『Soil without Land』をプロデュース、スイス・ニオンの Vision du reel、および 韓国・ソウルの DMZ DOCSを含む主要な映画祭で上映されました。現在は、ミャンマーからチェンマイにかけての避難民の少数民族に焦点を当ててリサーチを行っています。

キュレーター
Loredana Pazzini-Paracciani は、インディペンデント・キュレーター、作家であり、東南アジア・コンテンポラリーアート講師です。彼女のリサーチとキュレーター実践は、東南アジアにおける批評的社会政治問題に焦点を当て、反覇権主義的、非西洋中心的な議論を提唱しています。主な出版物に、『Frames Cinema Journal』(University of St Andrews、イギリス)、『Convocarte: Revista de Ciências da Arte』(Lisbon University、ポルトガル)、『M.A.tter Unbound』(LASALLE College of the Arts、シンガポール)など。イギリス「the Association for Southeast Asian Studies」、ベルリン大学「Research Network for Transcultural Practices in the Arts and Humanities」のメンバーでもあります。Patrick D. Flores と『the anthology Interlaced Journeys: Diaspora and the Contemporary in Southeast Asian Art』を共同編集、香港の Osage Art Foundation より2020年に出版されています。

アーティスト・プロフィール:

Nontawat Numbenchapol は1983年生まれ、バンコク育ち。タイ人映画監督、兼、テレビ番組のシナリオライターであり、彼のドキュメンタリー作品は広く知られています。ランシット大学芸術デザイン学部ビジュアルコミュニケーションデザイン学科卒業。

Numbenchapol は、カンヌ国際映画祭パルム・ドール受賞者であるアピチャッポン・ウィーラセタクンとたびたび協働してきました。主なプロジェクトに、『UNCLE BOONMEE WHO CAREN HIS PAST LIVES』(スチルカメラ)、『FOR TONIGHT』(撮影監督)、『FIREWORKS(ARCHIVES)』(プロジェクトマネージャー)、『CEMETERY OF SPLENDOUR』(メイキング映像)などがあります。

2013年、Numbenchapol は釜山国際映画祭とアート・ネットワーク・アジアの資金提供により、初めてのドキュメンタリー映像作品『BOUNDARY』を制作。これまで知られることのなかったタイ・カンボジア国境に暮らす地元住民の視点を描き出しました。Numbenchapol は、Bangkok Critics Assembly よりヤング・フィルムメーカーアワードを受賞し、『BOUNDARY』はベルリン国際映画祭、アムステルダム・ ドキュメンタリー国際映画祭(IDFA)、山形国際ドキュメンタリー映画祭など多くの映画フェスティバルで上映されました。同年、水鉛汚染の影響を受けたKlity村民について自身の二作品目となるドキュメンタリー『The RIVER』を制作。ロカルノ国際映画祭でタイ映画として初めて特別賞を受賞しました。

2016年には、人生とアイデンティティを問う10代の女の子「ジョジョ」の物語である、ハイブリッド・ドキュ・フィクション『#BKKY』を制作しました。ジョジョのキャラクターは、バンコクで高校を卒業したばかりの10代の若者100人に、自分たちの愛や夢、成人式についてインタビューしたものを編集したものです。2016年10月、釜山国際映画祭でプレミア上映され、ドイツの Lesbisch Schwule Filmtage Hamburg から長編特別優秀審査員賞を受賞しました。

AURA ASIA ART PROJECT

June 2020

ART4D: COVID DIARY LOCKDOWN

I’ve been telling myself throughout this COVID-19 situation that I’m lucky that the lockdown allows me to stay home and finish editing all my works, after having spent the entire year in researching and producing a great many sources. Among those is what I’ll be presenting at Ver Gallery on July 11.

For this work, I picked one interviewee, out of scores of Burmese immigrants who work at bars and live in Chiang Mai, hoping for better lives.

I became friends with many of them, following their lives from a distance via Facebook feeds. For the one I chose, I offered him what I, and he, wanted the most, taking him across the border back to his hometown in Shan State, after six years away. I asked for his permission to film this.

Editing works, I haven’t set my feet out for a month, feeling I have more time than ever before reconsidering what I’m doing.

I’m still following their lives, at home via Facebook. All of them are unemployed because of the closure of the bars. Many couldn’t go home and need to take any available jobs, mostly daytime construction work—the one in my artwork as well.

Occasionally, I ask him how he’s holding up. He has 200 baht left, having instant noodles with eggs everyday. His Thai girlfriend also works a nightlife job. She’s not qualified for the government’s 5,000-baht relief subsidy, but some of my friends who’re doing much better financially are. I can’t help questioning the management of this relief.

Two months have passed: Thailand’s COVID-19 infection rate is at a satisfactory level; the suicide rate is, though, higher than that of COVID-19 related deaths. This is a fruitful outcome of the government’s masterful restriction of people’s rights by imposing curfews. The total opposite can be said for their people’s management skills, judging from the relief and healing measures. The gaps between social classes have been made clear, and those who don’t have access to resources, in particular, are bogged down and cannot find a possible way to continue living in this area of the Earth called Thailand.

ART4D

January 2019

Tatler Asia

Gen.T Leaders of Tomorrow (Thailand)
Named to Tatler’s Gen.T list of Thailand’s most promising young leaders — recognised among the region’s trailblazing creatives and changemakers for his socially engaged documentary work.

read more…

November 2018

I LAW: Cases Against Freedom of Expression

Complainant / Plaintiff The National Film and Video Board (National Board), authorized under article 7 of the Film and Video Act B.E. 2551 (2008) to consider the decision of the Committee for Film and Video Censorship (Censorship Committee) in the appellate process. The Censorship Committee, appointed by the Ministry of Culture, authorized under article 16 of the Film Act to consider and categorize films for commercial release in the Kingdom. I LAW…

September 2018

Asian Movie Pulse :Interview with Nontawat Numbenchapol

Thai director Nontawat Numbenchapol was born in 1983 in Bangkok. After graduating in Visual Communication at Rangsit University in Pathum Thani, Numbenchapol worked on numerous projects as still photographer and cinematographer. His work as a photographer was part of many exhibitions in his home country and abroad. In Thailand, he had worked with directors such as Paween Puritpanya and Apichatpong Weerasethakul.

Numbenchapol’s documentaries  deal with issues such as history, identity and borders between people. “Boundary” and “By the River”, both released in 2013, were featured in international festivals and have received much praise. We speak with him about the path that led him to filmmaking, the conflict between Thailand and Cambodia, his approach to the medium, his motivation as an artist and his future projects.

How would you define your approach to filmmaking and documentaries?

I never dreamed of being a documentary filmmaker. But when I was young I went to the university and studied graphic design, but this was really boring to study. And then I wanted to make films at that time, but I did not know how to do it. At the time, a close friend of mine who is a skateboarder, has been recording, over the years, along with his friends, much footage by themselves. And I had the idea to use that footage in one of my films. So, everything I learned is from that time and every time I tried to make a feature film, it is not good, so I rather make a documentary.

So when I grew up I planned to make my first feature documentary “Boundary” and it was then I decided it was time to decide what my style, my approach was going to be like, in terms of visuals and editing.

You said the overall production of “Boundary” took over three years. Given the subject of the film, was the shooting process dangerous or difficult even?

I am not sure about dangerous, but when I made the film I was interested in the border between Thailand and Cambodia and the political conflict, especially in Bangkok. When I was young I have never been interested in political issues, but when I was living in Bangkok the conflict affected me, I became aware of the two sides of it. I started to read many books about the issue and to research about Thailand’s political history. And then, one day, the Thai soldiers shot almost 100 protesters on the street, by the government’s order. I was completely shocked by the situation, especially when some of my closest friends supported these acts, so I wanted to know more about the situation, what happened in reality and between people.

And then I met a young soldier who was ordered to shoot a number of protesters. He had gone through “real” situations, not like me sitting at my computer and on the internet. He had been sent to the south of the country and with him, I could feel something human: he never wanted to kill anyone, but this had been an order by the government. When he mentioned he would return to his village close to the border, to his family, I asked if if he wanted to be part of my documentary and he agreed. I stayed with him for two or three weeks.

During that time, I heard about ongoing fights between the Thai and the Cambodian government regarding Preah Vihear Temple and so I shaped my story around this area and its people. And this was a bit dangerous, because I heard about people who had died in that fight, houses were burnt and people had to move out of the town due to that. I was worried a war would break out between the two sides.

Up to that time, I had only been talking to Thai villagers and I felt if I only have the Thai side to the story, it might not look good. So I wanted to cross the border over to Cambodia, but because of the conflict I could not go. I tried to get someone to take me over, but no one would do it. I tried looking for Cambodians wiling to take me across the border and shoot over there, but they also did not want to take me. So I spend a year looking and finally my producer Davy Chou helped my to find someone.

I was lucky because Davy knew someone, a girl, who studied in New York, whose hometown was near Preah Vihear Temple. She wanted to help me, because she wanted to let Thai people know what happened on their side of the border, and she also told me I could not tell anyone over there I am Thai, I should pretend I am one of her friends from New York. This helped, because the Cambodians living in her village were really nice to me, took me anywhere and told me what happened on their side of the border. But I did not want to stay for more than a week, because I started feeling guilty when they told me their stories about the conflict.

When “Boundary” was finished and had premiered in Berlin, I tried to bring it to Thailand for a screening. But I never expected what would happen next, because the Thai government censored my film and later banned it. I realized how difficult it is to talk about political issues like this and I posted about what had happened on my Facebook account. When I woke up the next morning 2000 people had shared my post, more than one million people commented on my post and many newspapers – not one from Thailand – , for example from Italy, called me for an interview. Three days later they cancelled the ban, but asked me to delete two scenes from the film which were three or four seconds long. The first shows a place where Thai soldiers had died.  The other one was showing part of the New Year Celebration.

Since this would not hurt the topic of the film I re-edited the movie, and also I had been worried about something else. In Thailand, according to the law, criticizing the government or the King could mean going to jail for five to ten years. So eventually I changed the film and it could be screened in Thailand. However, when people, especially in cities like Bangkok saw the film, they sometimes were a bit angry and did not want to talk with me afterwards anymore.

So I guess your film actually surpassed the boundaries of the government in some way. That’s great.

There is this impressive long take of a long drive with the eye of the camera shielded behind the car window. Can you give us some details about this scene? Is there anyway to overcome this boundary?

When I was shooting the film, I tried to put many boundaries within the film, not only the space, but also objects like the windows of a car. Outside you can see many things like birth and death, happy and sad faces, kids and old people or the new and the past year. There are many boundaries in my film.

I think in human life, boundaries are not there at first, and as time goes by they help to organize things which is important, but can also cause a lot of trouble. In the end, we learn to live with these boundaries in our lives.

In your opinion, can films and documentaries make a change in the world?

I think in some cases this is true, but for me that is not the most important aspect. In my films I am mostly looking for an answer to my question. And when people see my film, I hope they get to know something new, learn something, like me when I make these films.

Every time I make a documentary I learn something new about people, about places and about history. Then, I can survive understanding something better and I hope an audience can do the same. When I made “By the River,” the film helped the village and the people living there a bit, especially when I screened it in that village and invited a lot of media outlets. In this case it may help their case, can make their lives better. So sometimes, a film can help make a change.

Both of your films depict a society or people that have been destabilized in a way, yet at the same time, especially in “By the River”, they maintain a sense of harmony even though it may be lost. In what way is your work about trauma and overcoming it?

In many documentaries, the people you see are often under pressure or are in some kind of trouble. But for my way of making documentaries I try to understand them, look at them from a human perspective, even if I cannot really help them. Sometimes I help them see something beautiful in their lives rather than the sadness or the sorrows.

In your statement regarding “By the River,” you say if the film can do anything, it is to create awareness, yet at the same time you claim your film represents a “neutral view”. Is there such a thing a a neutral view in film?

Sometimes, when I shoot a documentary like “By the River” I put the camera on record and I walk out for 10 or 15 minutes. I also do not like to use voice-over that much in my films, but in the case of “Boundary” I had to when I had the feeling something was not made clear or was confusing. With “By the River” I did not have to use it at all.

Creating awareness for me happens during the editing process, when the film is put together. And eventually, when the film is screened to an audience.

Both your films also show a wide gap between rural and urban Thailand in terms of politics, awareness of the other and social structures. How visible is this gap in real life?

My home country Thailand is still a developing country because many people have come to Bangkok over the years and stay there for most of their lives. They do not care much for the surrounding areas or the other Thai provinces, they do not realize there is a difference between their lives and the ones of those in rural areas. Shooting “Boundary” really opened my eyes, made me realize Thailand is not only Bangkok and many problems happen in my country, and these issues are the ones I want Thai people to know about.

On a technical level, did you have a plan when it came to eventually structuring and editing “By the River” and “Boundary” because both films are quite different in terms of structure?

As I said before, when I make a documentary I try to bring different techniques to the project. For “Boundary”, as my first feature, I had no specific plan which is why it took so long to make the film and edit it. I improvised and had many problems during editing, because the film shifts between spaces and people, and also because I did not want to use voice over too much. Eventually, I used a lot of a the interviews as well as captions.

“By the River” was different because I decided to shoot in a small village and I decided to set up the characters very clearly before shooting. Even though I still had to use captions, I also developed my style in this film.

At last, what are your plans for the future? Do you have any project you are currently working on?

I think you have heard about my new project called “#BKKY”. For this one, I have interviewed over 100 Thai teenagers in Bangkok, who have never heard of my films, and edited them together. I want to try and make teenagers in Thailand watch my films and ,therefore, change, in terms of style.

Additionally, I have started researching about the Thai border in the north to Myanmar, about the problems of ethnic minorities over there who have been through conflicts with soldiers from Myanmar and both governments. At the moment, we are shooting inside a military training camp in which soldiers, mostly coming from these minorities, fight the Myanmar army.

Are you talking about the Ronhingya, a refugee group and Muslim minority in Thailand and Myanmar?

In Myanmar there are over 100 ethnic minorities and the Rohingya is just one of them. People like them have been through a lot of suffering and feel no one really cares about them and so I would like the world to know about them and their struggles.

Before we come to the end, could you tell me something about the Thai film industry? How is the situation at the moment? What kind of films does the general public like to watch?

For independent and documentary filmmaking the situation is certainly better than ten years ago, especially after directors like Apichatong Weerasethkul began releasing their films. Of course, the mainstream, popcorn cinema still has a lot bigger audience and bigger budgets to make its films. Independent filmmakers still have to rely largely on government funding. Most of the time, screening a film at an international festival is better for an independent film than releasing in Thailand which has only got a limited amount of cinemas showing them.

Asian Movie Pulse…

October 2017

Bodies of Occupation: Conversation with Nontawat Numbenchapol

This conversation with the film director Nontawat Numbenchapol on his movie Boundary(2013), which follows a young soldier called in Bangkok to break up the “red shirts” protest (2011) to his hometown in Sisatek, a zone of conflict between Thailand and Cambodia due to the ongoing political dispute between the two countries over the Preah Vihear Temple. Boundary was funded by Busan International Film Festival and Art Network Asia. Numbenchapol received the Young Filmmaker award from the Bangkok Critics Assembly and Boundary screened across many film festivals such as Berlin International Film Festival, International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam (IDFA), and Yamagata International Documentary Film Festival.

Read more..

August 2017

TIMEOUT: Q & A with Nontawat Numbenchapol

Q & A with Nontawat Numbenchapol A quick chat with the award-winning documentary director on his first experimental docu-fiction, #BKKY

#BKKY is about teenage life and is quite different from your previous works. Why did you decide to make a film on this topic? 

I’ve always been interested in making films that I’ve never done before, but are, in some way, still related or accumulated from my old works. I was thinking about an audience that generally doesn’t watch the experimental documentaries I usually make, like teenagers who grew up in the city. So I felt like making a movie for them. I decided to interview 100 Bangkok-based teens on topics like love, dreams, studies, and family to learn more about them.

What did you find out from interviewing these teens?
What’s interesting is that teenagers these days have more digital options from Google to Youtube and Netflix. The rise of the digital age has resulted in individuals who are more grown-up, more confident and [accepting of] more varieties of love. Over 60 percent of those I spoke to consider themselves gender-fluid and base their relationships more on their feelings and less on gender.

What are you trying to express through this film?
I wanted to reflect on what the world has become through the eyes of teenagers. When I spoke with these interviewees, I came to realize that all the problems that I thought were massively huge when I was around their age and had no one to talk to are in fact common issues everybody encounters at a certain age. I’d like teenagers to see the movie and feel like they have a friend who shares the same sort of problems, and probably feel stronger after watching it. I hope [the film] could serve as a platform for generating discussion.

Time Out…

May 2014

BK Magazine: Nontawat Numbenchapol on the haunting truth

Nontawat Numbenchapol on the haunting truth behind his new feature documentary, By The River

Why did you choose Klity Village as the setting?

When planning the project, we wanted to present a kind of neutral story, something everyone can relate to. So we started research into the environmental problems facing the country. Talking with activists, we heard a lot of shocking stories. Klity Village is one example where people fought and won against a big factory and the pollution control department. We hope their victory will inspire people fighting other cases of environmental pollution. Being a small village deep in the woods, it also allowed us to work in a more controllable environment to create beautiful pictures.

How was the filming experience compared to working on Boundary?

We spent three years filming Boundary, a lot of traveling. By The River was a relatively much smaller project. It was more about adjusting to the environment, like the limited electricity and clean drinking water. Also timing and planning was essential to get the footage we needed.

We first thought we’d see the villagers with some sort of deformity, but they look just normal. Yet beneath that, everyone’s blood is contaminated with lead. Likewise, under the clear water at the bottom of the river, there’s lead, which is a heavy metal. The villagers’ diet relies on fish from the river, so it affects the children’s brain function. Most of the elders who experienced the problem at its peak are dead, while some are now living with blindness.

Filming was divided into two phases; when we returned to Klity for the second period, we found our lead character had passed away. That had a big impact on the film: as you can see, it gets heavier, gloomier and has a haunting feel to it.

Does your background in graphic design contribute to the visuals in your films?

It does a lot. Studying visual communication design, I know precisely how to compose, leaving me with the camera techniques to work on. Now that I know my way around the camera and shooting, it’s become easier to accomplish the shots. I also worked with Withit Chanthamarit [emerging photographer whose work recently exhibited at Speedy Grandma’s Inhabitation exhibition], who shares a similar photography style, on set. Cinematography-wise, it’s almost like still images: static but moving.

What do you think of the general perception of documentaries here in Thailand?

It’s better than last year. But most people are still stuck with this picture of a TV documentary, with a lot of boring talking heads. But if we look globally, it’s evolved a lot. Maybe it’s down to more access to equipment which allows more people to work. It’s exciting now; the challenge of making a documentary is in how people are competing in altering the form of a documentary, playing with the form structure, almost redefining it, like The Act of Killing or The Missing Picture, which are much acclaimed by critics. I hope the trend will soon arrive in the mainstream here, too.

BK Magazine…

December 2013

WISE KWAI Top 10 Film 2013

What’s it about? The Cambodian border conflict around Preah Vihear temple is the main focus for this documentary that also surveys the colour-coded political divide in Thai society.

Who directed it? Nontawat Numbenchapol, making his feature debut with “Boundary”, which premiered at the Berlin International Film Festival.

Why’s it good? With an artful, observational style, Nontawat takes a snapshot of a timely, complex issue. Though it was well received in Berlin, at home the director had to overcome censorship issues, and his film was initially banned when he sought a commercial release. After an outcry in the social media and coverage in the international press, the ban was rescinded. But the film’s political subject caused Thailand’s Major Cineplex movie chain to have second thoughts about showing it. In the end, Nontawat had to make his limited release even more limited as he hired out the theatres and sold tickets himself, shepherding the film around the country.

WISE KWAI…

December 2013

indie eye: By the River di Nontawat Numbenchapol al Festival dei Popoli 54

Nontawat Numbenchapol, Bangkok, classe 1983, quattro prove di regia a partire dal 2006 con Weirdrosopher World, sa raccontare storie scomode che, se gli valgono censure e restrizioni in patria, lo collocano fra i nomi più promettenti di quella nuova generazione di registi thailandesi che il successo internazionale di Apichatpong Weerasethakul negli ultimi anni sta contribuendo a far conoscere.
Presente quest’anno a Berlino, sezione Outsiders, con Boundary, storia di Aod, operaio ventiquattrenne incontrato sul set di un film thailandese, che gli racconta il suo passato di soldato al servizio del regime militare in Thailandia e in guerra contro la Cambogia, Numbenchapol parla di guerra e morte, caos e distruzione girando la macchina dalla parte delle vittime. Non vola un proiettile nel suo film, ma lo strazio non ne esce diminuito.
Anche in Sai nam tid shoer (By the River) la denuncia non è urlata, passa attraverso il formatdocumentario su cui s’innestano scarni frammenti di fiction. Fra i due poli “uomo nella natura” e “uomo contro la natura”, l’asse mediano è il fiume Klity, curiosamente chiamato il “ruscello”, che scorre nella provincia di Kanchanaburi, passa per Bangkok e sfocia nel Golfo di Thailandia. Protagonista di un disastro ambientale di portata ragguardevole, sulle sue rive sorge Lower Klity, villaggio abitato da una comunità di origini antiche, etnia karen, dedita alla pesca. Tutt’intorno respira, profonda, la foresta tropicale. Una piccola scuola, una giovane maestra che insegna a leggere ai bambini, un ragazzo con stampella che pesca nell’acqua bassa con un bastone, un gatto a cui fa coccole sopra un carretto insieme alla ragazza nella pausa delle lezioni. Una vecchia cieca, la nonna, che mastica noci di cocco, silenzi ovattati nella calura umida del meriggio. Numbenchapol si sposta con gradazione millimetrica verso il centro, restringe lentamente il campo intorno ai personaggi, porta il linguaggio al minimo. L’inquadratura fissa lascia il tempo di scrutare a lungo oggetti e registrare movimenti, i suoni della natura si smorzano nell’armonia di leggeri arpeggi di chitarra, ma intanto una sensazione di attesa cresce, fino a diventare un presagio funesto e indefinito. Alla metà circa dei settantun minuti del film gli indizi seminati prendono corpo.
L’acqua del fiume è inquinata dalle scorie di un impianto industriale che lavorava minerali a monte della zona. La fabbrica è chiusa da quattordici anni, ma ha lasciato sul letto uno strato di piombo e schiuma come di shampo, i pesci sono contaminati e la salute degli abitanti è stata compromessa gravemente.
Alcuni sono diventati ciechi, altri disabili, ma si continua a pescare quel pesce con mezzi primitivi, tuffandosi anche se c’è pericolo, anche se si riemerge con strane vertigini e si sa che le grotte sul fondo possono creare un risucchio che impedisce di tornare a galla. Sono i discorsi dei due ragazzi della prima parte a mettere in allarme. L’innesto della fiction sul documentario è impercettibile, i sottotitoli traducono voci distanti di una coralità paesana invisibile, ma è quella che sentiamo stringersi intorno alla famiglia che ha perso un figlio, annegato, forse per volere dell’oscuro spirito della foresta.
I gesti rituali di tradizioni antiche ora riprendono il loro ruolo, i bonzi intonano le litanie per il Buddha, si cucina a lungo per le offerte agli spiriti. Nel punto lungo il fiume in cui il corpo è stato cremato c’è la sua tomba, e lì vicino continuano a giocare i bambini e passa un pescatore con quattro pesci infilzati nel bastone da pesca a mano. A Bangkok i pochi abitanti di Klipy di cui nessuno più si ricordava hanno manifestato con cartelli, il funzionario del governo ha detto belle e giuste parole, l’hanno ascoltato sorridenti mentre li esortava a non mangiare quel pesce e ad usare i soldi della paga per comprarlo, se proprio non volevano mangiar carne. Ma quale paga? Siamo poveri.
Una miscela inedita fra presa diretta sul reale e dimensione sognante questa di Sai nam tid shoer, ottenuta con carrellate lente che dilatano le emozioni creando attesa. Le leggende ancestrali della terra affiorano, appena suggerite da una messa in scena sempre più rarefatta, convivono sullo stesso piano narrazione e silenzio totale, realtà e finzione, passato e futuro. Ciò che s’imprime nella visione diventa gusto amaro nella post-visione, le suggestioni della foresta tropicale, le apparizioni del fiume, ora scrosciante, ora calmo e maestoso, non risultano empatiche. Da quella massa d’acqua, che si scompone nelle rifrazioni della luce solare, emergono vicende politiche e sociali della Thailandia e di una realtà rurale che sta morendo. L’impatto con la modernità l’ha fermata e fermerà anche molto altro lungo la sua strada. Quell’acqua carica di piombo arriva fino a Bangkok per poi confluire, al termine della sua corsa, nel Golfo di Thailandia. Quindi, di passo in passo, nel gran padre Oceano.

indie eve…

November 2013

The Hollywood Reporter : By the River

By the River (Sai Nam Tid Shoer): Film Review”
A review of By the River, Nontawat’s documentary on a Karen village living beside a lead-contaminated creek in Kanchanaburi — praised as a quiet, composed meditation on rural lives and environmental injustice.

Just months after gracing the Berlinale with Boundary – a documentary which touches on the once-deadly and still-festering frontier row between Thailand and Cambodia – Nontawat Numbenchapol has swiftly reappeared with yet another piece digging into yet another controversy set in his home country’s far-flung borderlands: By the River revolves around a village in western Thailand still reeling from the ecological disaster brought about by contamination from a leaking lead mine.

Not that By the River will be troubling Thai censors as Boundary did back in April though, when the film was initially banned from domestic release before the authorities backtracked two days later and granted permission for screenings: the issue at hand here is certainly less politically sensitive here, and Nontawat’s treatment also leans towards the contemplative and poetic than his previous film which, though hardly a hard-edged critique on the status quo, comprises mentions of fatalities of a government crackdown on demonstrations in 2010 and also a Cambodian soldier’s condemnation of the Thai government’s military maneuvers.

While certainly made with the palpable aim of raising debates about the environmental catastrophes rural dwellers have endured so as to keep cities (and their social elites) thriving, By the River conducts its argument by revealing gently the lingering pain and anguish beneath lush, pastoral vistas which have seemingly recovered from that deadly eco-calamity 15 years ago. Like Boundary, By the River would certainly build on the acclaim it has already received ever since its premiere at Locarno (where it was garlanded with a Special Mention nod), with its appearances at Yamagata, Hong Kong and (in a fortnight’s time) Luang Prabang signaling more stops on the festival circuit, and also green-themed events beyond Asia.

For the uninitiated, By the River could easily pass off as simply a depictment of rural life in Thailand: it will be nearly halfway into this 67-minute film that a combination of visuals (petitions at the town hall, court hearings) and on-screen text would bring to the fore the sufferings of Lower Klity, where its inhabitants – who belong to the Karen ethnic minority – felt the brunt of toxic waste seeping from a lead mine into the river which their lives depend on.

But the villager’s calm, quotidian existence and quiet laments – a man on crutches speaking to his listless friend about his and others’ physical ailments; a gentle schoolteacher helping local children to learn the alphabet; an old woman talking about her optic nerves shattered by exposure to the poison – only heightens the feeling of a haven lost, with these marginalized and hapless villagers becoming sacrifices for the well-being of the unseen urbanites out there in Bangkok. One of Nontawat’s on-screen texts ruminates how the Karen people’s tribute to their powerful rulers for four centuries is now just repaid by lead – and now these silent sufferings have remained unheard by the center. “Will the waste dumped 30 to 40 years ago finally reach the Gulf of Thailand?” the director asks through another intertitle; By the River is perhaps that catalyst designed to carry this message downwater more rapidly, more urgently.

Given how the catastrophe began because of a river’s flowing currents, Nontawat’s film puts nature and its elements the very center of its visual narrative. Water, of course, is omnipresent; the underwater scenes – in which boys prod the riverbed for fish, an act which also points to possible toxin which might have remained there – provides some kinetic counterpoint to mostly slow-burning sequences, such as the static observations of, say, how human life and poetic scenarios (a reflected moon slowly morphing into something akin an expanding star) burst out of the stream. And then there are the ashes, the remnants of burning embers and also the funereal pyre of a man recently deceased.

While Nontawat sometimes errs towards an excessive mournful tone (he could easily have cut back on the use of the fade-to-black) but By the River remains an enchanting piece which could bring forth more awareness of misery in the margins – which the Karen people are certainly confined to, an issue which has also been raised in October by Sopawan Boonnimitra and Peerachai Kerdsint‘s Busan festival entry The Isthmus. But while the latter is mired mid-way in between direct political engagement and melancholic meanderings, Nontawat’s offering goes straight for the unsaid to nudge people towards social advocacy, with engaging results.

Venue: Hong Kong Asian Film Festival
Production Companies: Ok-Pi-Dern and Mobilelab
Director: Nontawat Numbenchapol
Co-producer: Theepisit Mahaneeranonit
Executive Producers: Krittavit Rimtheparthip, Somchai Suwanban
Cinematographers: Withit Chanhamarit, Nontawat Numbenchapol, Grisda Saisungchalao, Gumpa Funfeo, Vichai Ogan Nasuanbarisut
Editor: Wasunan Hutawet
Music: Karen Musicians, Uncle Pachong, Auntie Meaonong In Karen and Thai
67 minutes

Hoolywood Reporter

August 2013

Bangkok Post : Reward flows for Nontawat’s By the River

After a rough start, Nontawat Numbenchapol is enjoying a rewarding year. On Sunday, the 66th Locarno International Film Festival in Switzerland, one of Europe’s oldest cinefests and a much-respected jamboree of art-house movies, awarded a Special Mention prize to his new film By The River, which tells the story of Lower Klity village in Kanchanaburi province, where residents have been affected by lead poisoning incidents.

The film’s Thai title is Maenam Tid Chua, or literally “infected river”. The version that won the prize in Locarno runs slightly over one hour, but the film was originally conceived and broadcast for the Thai PBS channel. The television version, which aired a few months ago, was only 22 minutes long.

The director, along with his producer at Ok Pai Dern company, will explore the possibility of releasing the full version in cinemas.

The Karen village of Klity has been in the news for decades after its main creek suffered lead contamination, a disastrous result of mining since the 1970s, which has seriously threatened the lives and well-being of villagers.

 

After lengthy legal battles, last year the Supreme Court made an important ruling by ordering the Pollution Control Department to clean up Klity Creek.

By The River, however, tells the story with the eye of an impressionist painter: the film largely consists of tranquil, breathtaking shots of the nature around the village, with minimal dialogue that only alludes to the fatal aftermath of the environmental horror. Children play and young men in the village still go spear-fishing _ and one of them becomes the latest victim of the contaminated creek that looks so inviting on the surface.

There’s only one section of the film that captures the scenes at a Bangkok court when the Karen villagers arrive for the hearing.

This is the second Nontawat documentary film to make the news this year.

On April 30, the director found himself in one of the year’s most perplexing headlines: his documentary film Boundary (Fah Tam Pandin Soong), which discusses the Thai-Cambodian border conflict, was banned by Thai censors _ only to be un-banned and cleared for screening two days later.

The film board even apologised to the director and said a “technical error” led to its initial decision.

Boundary had a limited release in cinemas in June.

By The River won the prize in the Cinema of the Present section, which focuses on young and up-and-coming filmmakers.

_ Kong Rithdee

Bangkok Post

 

August 2013

Asian Movie Pulse

Even though one might not have the specific oversight of the political and social upheavals in Thailand and Cambodia, the story of the red shirt/yellow shirt divide and the Preah Vihear Temple-debate are symbols of a growing divide. While the former has increased the chasm between rural and urban Thailand as well as its social classes, the latter has resulted in conflicts which have shaken the border region between the two states. By the end of 2010, only months after the red shirt protests opposing the government, the social and political fabric of Thailand could not have been more damaged.

It was during this time – more precisely during New Years Eve 2010 – when Thai filmmaker Nontawat Numbenchapol found the subject for his first documentary. In a statement to his debut feature “Boundary,” the director says he was working on another project when he started thinking about the nature of boundaries and borders. However, it was not so much the geographical definition which he was interested in, but more the emotional and spiritual boundaries within society. While a celebration meant to unite people expecting the promises and possibilities of the new year, Numbenchapol saw a country more divided than ever. And while the positivism of the celebration may fade, the feeling of unrest, upheaval and violence led to the question of how deep the change had been, how visible the scars and the wounds of the past months were.

However, it was not so much the nature of his new film, but also the reaction of the state which answered this question to some extent. Because the film represented a “threat to national security and international relations,” it was banned in Thailand by the state, a rare procedure which made Numbenchapol join the ranks of colleagues like Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Tanwarin Sukkupisit, whose films had also been banned. Ironically, as many journalists pointed out, the same rating system banning these films saw no problem with films like “The Hangover Part II”, a movie whose portrayal of the country and its people is more than just problematic to say the least. Following the director’s appeal, “Boundary” was in the end re-edited with some small parts of the film in which the sound had to be muted and eventually the ban was lifted.

For a movie which is essentially about the nature of human division and the social fabric of a country, Numbenchapol’s images are often eerily static and quiet. Often combined with  long takes of drives through villages, of fields and buildings as well as people moving through the landscape, a viewer may get the impression of a state of shock as the omnipresent condition of the film. Indeed, given the immediacy of the past events, the nature of the conflicts shown in the film, sometimes only present in the words of the people in front of the camera, and the seriousness of the wounds in the landscape, no one should be surprised by this condition. As the camera follows a man re-telling the story of his escape from bombings or a woman breaking out in tears having lost her home and belongings, the bomb craters in the ground reflect the emotional scar tissue of the people the movie shows.

Naturally, words are somewhat flawed in this environment. Numbenchapol’s use of long takes, sparse sub-titles and the long silences of the people he interviews represent repercussions of a long, brutal and still ongoing conflict. While some may be invisible on the surface, any attentive viewer will soon look closer at the images, the expressions and the landscape finding traces of these events and what they have left behind.

Most importantly, as the title of the film suggests, the camera looks at the nature the boundaries, physical and psychological, created in the course of time. The director follows a more universal approach concerning these matters, one which is, at the same time, closely connected to the setting of the film, but applicable to the nature of conflicts anywhere in the world. Whether it is about red shirts or yellow shirts, Thai or Cambodian, rural or urban background, there are two aspects “Boundary” focuses on: how much we admit these boundaries as a force in our lives, and to what extent outside factors (politics, religion, class) have emphasized them over time.

Additionally, the atmospheric use of sound and music composed by Katenan Juntimathorn stresses the contemplative nature of the film. Especially in the scenes showing the relationship of people and their environment, the director’s approach works best to present the traumatizing effects of the conflict, of the divide between people. At times, the somewhat helpless, sometimes hopeful expression captured in the eye of the camera may show a glimpse of the promise a new year has in store, the possibility of healing the wounds at some point in time.

“Boundary” is an impressive piece of work about the nature of human divisions, about conflict and the wounds these leave behind. While at times difficult to endure, given the nature of the images shown on screen, Numbenchapol still maintains a small glimpse of hope, a curiosity in the people and landscapes he shows. In the end, maybe it is this kind of feeling which may resolve the issue, which may bring forward what unites rather than divides people.

Asian Movie Pulse

June 2013

The Nation: A ‘Boundary’ some won’t cross

Nontawat Numbenchapol thought he was just making his first feature-length film. It turned out he was baking a hot potato. “Boundary” (“Fahtum Pandinsoong”) immediately got a lot of free publicity when the Film and Video Board decided it couldn’t be shown. But they and nontawat talked things over and they said, “Okay, never mind.” So a press screening was set up this past Monday, only for word spread on Facebook that Major Cineplex might not allow “Boundary” to be shown. But then they and Nontawat talked things over and came to an agreement. “Boundary” is screening at the Major Cineplex Airport Plaza in Chiang Mai until tomorrow. It’ll then be at the EGV Tesco Lotus in Khon Kaen next Thursday and Friday and then at the Major Cineplex Udon Thani on July 16 and 17. It returns to Bangkok’s Esplanade Ratchada on July 18. Major Cineplex remains nervous enough about the movie that it won’t sell “Boundary” tickets through its own system. So Nontawat has to sit in the theatre lobby saying “Pssssst!” Just look for him an hour before showtime and slip him a red.

The Nation…

April 2013

THE DIPLOMAT : Thailand Bans Film on Preah Vihear

Two days after Thai authorities banned Boundary, a documentary about Thailand’s festering border dispute with Cambodia at Preah Vihear, censors have lifted the ban, citing a “technical mistake”. The ban occurred as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) prepares to make a ruling over territory surrounding the 11th century ruins.

Initially, Thai film censors claimed the documentary, which was directed by Nontawat Numbenchapol and debuted in February at the Berlin International Film Festival, was a threat to national security and international relations.

Further, authorities explained that a subcommittee with insufficient authority issued the ban. After watching the film for a second time on Thursday afternoon, censors changed their tune and said they found it inoffensive. The film has since been approved for viewers of 18 years and above.

The film, Boundary, is an account of the border conflict that erupted in 2008 as told by a former soldier living in the area and villagers from Cambodia and Thailand. When fighting intensified two years ago, 17 soldiers and one civilian were killed, while thousands of villagers were displaced.

Last year troops withdrew from the hilltop in the Dangrek Mountains after a demilitarized zone was established in The Hague.

Accounts from both sides of the conflict dating back to a 1962 ICJ rulingare detailed, but apparently a sub-committee governing film and video screening dismissed some of the Cambodian accounts as groundless, adding that some of this information was still before the court.

The ICJ is expected to clarify its 1962 ruling, which ruled that the thousand-year-old temple belonged to Cambodia but failed to definitively demarcate the borders surrounding the site. The land where Preah Vihear sits was occupied by the Khmer Rouge throughout Cambodia’s long running civil wars.

Although it has been lifted, the short-lived ban of Boundary was not an isolated case. Thai censors have made similarly questionable interpretations and harsh rulings in the past.

In 2011, a movie about a transgender father trying to raise two children – Insects in the Backyard – was deemed immoral and banned, while last year a local adaptation of Shakespeare’s Macbeth was banned amid arguments that it was divisive.

Thankfully, things turned out differently for Boundary and Numbenchapol’s film can now have an audience.

In an interview with the Hollywood Report Numbenchapol said, “Everyone I’ve spoken with who’s seen it says the film shows the point of view of every side, and that the film is neutral.”

He continued, “My intention was to let the film be a space for the people in the troubled territories to voice their views and feelings to the outside world – which they haven’t had a chance to express in other Thai media.”

The Diplomat

April 2013

Hollywood Reporter : Thailand Bans Local Documentary ‘Boundary’

Thai director Nontawat Numbenchapol’s independent documentary Boundary appears to have met one.

The Thai government announced a countrywide ban on the film Tuesday, saying its content is “a threat to national security and international relations.”

A modestly budgeted art-house doc, Boundary premiered at the Berlin International Film Festival in February. The film begins with footage of the so-called “red shirt” political protests that paralyzed Bangkok in 2010 and resulted in an armed standoff and the deaths of nearly 100 people. Nontawat then zeros in on one of the soldiers involved in the dispute and follows him to his hometown along the Thailand-Cambodia border, an area that has long been the focus of an occasionally violent border dispute between the two countries.

Conversations between the soldier, Nontawat and Cambodian and Thai villagers are overlaid upon scenes of the rural countryside, glimpses of damage wrought by the conflict and shots of an historic, 1,000-year-old Hindu temple, which both Thailand and Cambodia claim as their own, and which has often served as the fulcrum of the ongoing border spat.

On April 15, the UN’s International Court of Justice began a hearing over the temple and the surrounding area depicted in Boundary. Fighting in the region left 18 people dead and thousands of villagers displaced in April 2011. Thailand and Cambodia both made their cases for claim to the territory last week and are currently awaiting the UN high court’s decision, hoping for a resolution. Apart from the territorial issue, relations between the two countries are mostly positive, and they remain strong trading partners.

“I really didn’t expect this film to be banned,” Nontawat told The Hollywood Reporter. “Everyone I’ve spoken with who’s seen it says the film shows the point of view of every side, and that the film is neutral. My intention was to let the film be a space for the people in the troubled territories to voice their views and feelings to the outside world — which they haven’t had a chance to express in other Thai media.”

Referring to either the Red Shirt protests from 2010, or the border dispute with Cambodia — or both — the Thai Ministry of Culture division that issued the ban, added: “The film presents some information on incidents that are still being deliberated by the Thai court and that have not yet been officially concluded.”

Representatives from the Thai government were not immediately reachable for comment.

Thailand has a ratings classification system, but films can still be outright denied for mass consumption. Such bans are relatively rare, but there have been notable incidents, such as the barring of Palme d’Or winner Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s Syndromes and a Centuryin 2007, and Tanwarin Sukkhapisit’s Insects in the Backyard (2010), a drama about a self-destructive transsexual raising two teenagers who turn to prostitution. More recently, Thailand banned local director Ing K‘s Shakespeare Must Die (2012), which was billed as a Thai adaptation of Macbeth with contemporary political overtones. At the time, the government said its content “causes divisiveness among the people of the nation.”

Hollywood has fared comparatively better in recent years. Despite some local outcry over the Hangover 2’s stereotypical portrayal of the country as a place of prostitution and seedy intrigue — along with a fight scene set in a Buddhist monastery, which some in the Buddhist-majority country found blasphemous — the film was given the official thumbs-up for screening.

Nontawat says he and his producers were planning a limited release for Boundary at a few independent cinemas in Bangkok. The director says he now plans to appeal the ruling with the country’s National Film Board, but he is not optimistic for a reversal.

“Before Boundary, Insects in the Backyard and Shakespeare Must Diewere banned, and they both went to the administrative court, but they still haven’t gotten an answer,” he said. “I think it’s useless to appeal, but what else I can do?”

Hollywood Reporter…

April 2013

WISE KWAI’s Thai film journal: Review: Boundary

The thorny topic of Thailand and Cambodia’s border dispute around the ancient Preah Vihear temple is made much more interesting and easily digestible when it’s set to an indie rock and electronica music soundtrack.

In Boundary (ฟ้าต่ำแผ่นดินสูง, Fahtum Pandinsoong), filmmaker Nontawat Numbenchapol approaches his subject with the artful aesthetic that’s the calling card of other indie Thai filmmakers, with static camera set-ups, tracking shots in cars, slow-mo and blurs offering comment on the subject matter.

Known for his debut Weirdrosopher World, a documentary about Thai skateboarders, Nontawat apparently stumbled on the Boundary story by chance, at the New Year’s Eve celebration at the end of 2010. By coincidence, it was at Bangkok’s Ratchaprasong intersection, which earlier in the year had been occupied by the “red shirt” protests that ended badly, with dozens fatally shot by government forces and arson attacks. There, at the New Year’s countdown, he met a soldier on leave who was headed to his village in the Thai-Cambodian border area. Nontawat asked if he could tag along.

Politics are an unavoidable subtext to the images that the camera captures of a road trip from Bangkok to northeastern Thailand, accompanied at times by pulpy-sounding electronica beats.

A contentious topic for decades, Preah Vihear was awarded to Cambodia in a 1962 International Court of Justice verdict. The simmering border dispute boiled up again around 2008 when the Thai government at the time supported Cambodia’s bid for Unesco World Heritage status for the temple. It would benefit both sides, and boost tourism was the reasoning. But the move riled the royalist “yellow shirts”, who played the nationalist card and used Preah Vihear as a political cudgel. At issue is a disputed 4.6 square kilometer area around the temple that some contend is Thai soil. The yellow shirts conducted a campaign of activism that stirred things up and eventually resulted in the Thai and Cambodian sides sending in troops and lobbing shells at one another.

Popular YouTube footage from one of the firefights, looking like a grainy outtake from Full Metal Jacket, is included in Boundary.

Nontawat kept out of the line of fire, but visited spots that had been shelled. He accompanies Royal Thai Army officers has they inspect damage, including a rice granary that’s had its roof smashed, a bullet-pocked house and a vehicle with holes in it that aren’t decals. Another scene shows a school that had its roof damaged by the shelling.

His interviews with Thai residents reveal their upset about the hostilities at the border and being dragged into the dispute by the yeller shirts. They had enjoyed a good living off the tourism trade, and selling things on the Cambodian side of the border.

They also expressed indifference and perhaps disdain for the color-coded shirt movements. At dinner one night, it’s pointed out the hostess is wearing yellow, while another at the table is in red. “I am wearing no shirt,” the man of the house says. “I am too poor.”

Given an “in” to Cambodia by one of his producers, French-Cambodian filmmaker Davy Chou (Golden Slumbers), Nontawat also sought the other side of the story. Thai film expert Donsaron Kovitvanitcha is another producer, making Boundary a Thai-Cambodian production.

In his talk at Boundary‘s April 6 screening at the Salaya International Documentary Film Festival (it had its Thai premiere on April 1 as Salaya Doc’s opening film), Nontawat explained he had to tread lightly because Cambodians are generally suspicious of Thais. He didn’t want to end up like pair of yellow-shirt activists who were jailed as spies (a topic not covered in the film). So he posed as a Chinese-American student and got his interviews, which are punctuated by a toddler boy bouncing up and down on his toy car until he falls on his rear and bursts into tears.

In the end, Nontawat finally visits the temple itself, which is dramatically situated right on the border, on the shoulder of a mountain, overlooking the Cambodian valley below. I went there 12 years ago, and the only way in was through Thailand on a chicken bus from Aranyaprathet. Now there’s a sturdy road on the Cambodian side, which winds its way up the rugged slopes of the Dangrek Mountains, finally connecting the Angkorian treasure to the country that lays claim to it.

Boundary is one of those rare Thai political films. Most don’t end up getting a general release, but Boundary might be okay because the opinion from the Thai side of the border tends jibe with that of the “red shirts” and the sympathies of the current government.

While the documentary makes things clear, the reality of the situation is cloudy. Just as Boundary is beginning to be screened in Thailand, the International Court of Justice is holding hearings about the Preah Vihear issue. Cambodia called for the hearing in the face of the yellow-shirt activism, and will ask that the ICJ reinterpret its 1962 ruling. For its part, the Thai side says there is no dispute and asks that the case be thrown out.

It’s not expected to go well. Protests by the Thai interests are expected, adding much tension an already politically tense time.

WISE KWAI…

January 2012

Dazed : Film On The Rocks Yao Noi: Nontawat Numbenchapol

In December last year, Film on the Rocks Yao Noi invited seven young filmmakers specially selected by Apichatpong Weerasethakul to participate in a lab at the Yao Noi resort in Thailand, called Untamed. They were given the brief to create a proposal for a site-specific video installation related to the fish cages used by the fishermen on the island and the theme ‘primordial’. We caught up with young documentary maker, Nontawat Numbenchapol, whose winning proposal, ‘Aurora’, will be premiered at the Film on the Rocks festival this weekend.

I decided I will have three projectors, one for each primary colour. And the story in those three videos would be about the past, the present, and the future

Dazed Digital: How did you start making films?
Nontawat Numbenchapol:
 The first time I made a film was during a field trip at school. The teacher wanted us to write a report, but I had a video camera with me, so I gave my video, just as I recorded it, without editing. The teacher played it in the classroom, and everyone enjoyed it. Maybe that’s the reason I love making films. I always get feedback that is better than my expectations.

DD: In your biography it says that your work is about space – could you tell us a little bit more about that?
Nontawat Numbenchapol:
 My first documentary is about a group of Thai teenagers who love skateboarding. Their lifestyle is a foreign culture here and they have to struggle to find a space in order to do what they love. My second film is about my childhood, my house where I was brought up, and my grandma. The film I’m currently working on is about the Thailand-Cambodia border conflict. The people who live around that border, their cultures and lifestyles mingle, until there is no real line to separate their nations, there is only the border on the map, and the conflict caused from a few rulers that affects about 100,000 people living there.

I also try to look deeper and talk about human’s space, the border between children, grownups, elderly people, men, women, love, hatred, birth, and death. my first film is about the search for a space, the second film is about losing a space, this third film concludes point of view towards life.

DD: In December you were invited to Film on the Lab. How did that come about?
Nontawat Numbenchapol:
 We had a group called Thaiindie which was founded by Thunska Pansittivorakul. It was a network of independent and experiment filmmakers. We exchanged our films and screened them at festivals. My first film was supported from this group, and Apichatpong knew me from that. For this project, he chose seven young filmmakers that he was interested in. These are not directors that are already successful, and not some kids that have just finished a movie. They are new blood who make interesting films.

DD: Your untamed proposal Aurora won and has now been installed to be premiered at the festival. Please could you tell us about the piece?

Nontawat Numbenchapol: At the time, my grandma had just passed away for about three days. I was devastated and I couldn’t clear my mind or write anything about the works. Later I started to think about the word “primordial” which means the original stage. I happened to see a news piece about aurora. I found out that people in the past thought of aurora as a memorial to the dead. Then I thought about details in light, the origin of light, its primary colours, and when these three overlay, they make new colours, that is a vital basis in film. So I decided I will have three projectors, one for each primary colour. And the story in those three videos would be about the past, the present, and the future.

Aurora also reminded me of people who died at a young ages from the protest against political injustice. I shot some of my footages at Wat Pathum Wanaram, where some of the protestors were killed during the red shirts crackdown two years ago. I dedicate this work not only to my grandma, but to all those who passed away, especially those who died because they fought for justice.

Dazed…